4. In its historical supreme court in the case of Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India extended the protection of Article 21 Beyond executive action to include legislative action (law itself). The implications of the decision were:
1. The ambit of appeal against state widened from challenging “due process of law” to “procedure established by law”.
2. It widened the scope of Judicial review on the executive.
3. It was a big step towards separation of powers
4. None of these.
Which of the following statements are correct?