Left high and dry in the Nilgiris

Prelims level : Environment Mains level : GS-III Environment; Biodiversity
No Set Found with this ID

Why in News?

  • The Tamil Nadu Forest Department and more than 700 families in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve and Gudalur in the Nilgiris (including Kattunayakans, Irulas, Paniyas, and Kurumbas) signed the ‘golden handshake’ agreement.
  • The agreement was made after the Mountadden and Wayanadan Chetty communities obtained an order from the Madras High Court in 2007 seeking relocation away from the forest due to a lack of basic amenities.
  • The objective of the agreement was to benefit the local communities inside the tiger reserve and aid conservation efforts.
  • However, the Adivasis claim that the Chettys wanted to relocate as they had no traditional ties to the forest.
  • The first phase of the relocation started in 2017. Almost 569 families from the four Adivasi groups have been relocated so far.

Associated concerns:

  • Adivasis are dissatisfied with the relocation as they have not received the promised compensation.
  • An Adivasi rights activist highlights that many of the Adivasis are unaware of what they were owed in the first place because the promises were made with little paperwork and documentation.
  • Though the Mountadden and Wayanadan Chettys have largely relocated, Kattunayakans and the Paniyas have not been resettled fairly.
  • The two communities complain that they were cheated by a few Forest Department personnel, some landowners, or middlemen.
  • The activists are trying to ascertain the level of fraud, but there are many challenges like:
  • The community is suspicious of outsiders and it is difficult to gain their trust.
  • They are illiterate and do not know the money and accounts clearly.
  • There is a lack of documents and evidence.
  • Many land brokers have cheated them by over-inflating the land prices or relocating them to government land.
  • It is also argued by many experts that the funds for the relocation should have been granted by at least 2010 (as the land was affordable).
  • Now with inflation, it is difficult to find adequate land for earning a living through agriculture.
  • As there is no document to prove ownership of land, it is difficult to get compensation or a loan in case of crop failure.
  • The government-built houses allocated to relocated families are in dilapidated condition. Several other structures suffered damage due to heavy rains in 2018 and 2019.
  • Many cases of fraud have been perpetrated against Adivasi groups during the relocation process.
  • The communities have a deep connection with the forests that are considered sacred groves and sites of worship.
  • It is particularly difficult for older members of the community to leave the forest.
  • They also fear an identity loss if they move out of the forests.
  • Despite the allegations of fraud and cheating, the forest department is continuing the relocation process.

Conclusion:

  • Though some state officials and forest staff are trying to address the concerns of the Adivasis, nothing concrete has been done or achieved till now.
  • Many villagers are firm that they will not leave the forest until there are more favourable negotiations or at least what was promised in the original agreement is offered completely.
Share Socially