The Indus Water Treaty
The Indus Water Treaty (IWT) is a water-distribution treaty between India and Pakistan signed on September 19, 1960. The treaty was signed by the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistan’s President Ayub Khan. It was brokered by the World Bank (International Bank for Reconstruction and Development).
The Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) deals with river Indus and its five tributaries, which are classified in 2 categories:
- According to treaty, all the water of eastern riversshall be available for unrestricted use in India.
- India should let unrestricted flow of water from western riversto Pakistan.
- It doesn’t mean that India can’t use western river’s water. The treaty says that India can use the water in western rivers in “non-consumptive” needs. Here non consumptive means we can use it for irrigation, storage and even for electricity production. (But India has not fully utilized this provision so far).
- The treaty allocates 80% of water from the six-river Indus water system to Pakistan.
- A Permanent Indus Commissionwas set up as a bilateral commission to implement and manage the Treaty.
- Though Indus originates from Tibet, China has been kept out of the Treaty.
India-Pak Disputes Connecting Indus: Timeline
1948: India cuts off supply in most canals that went to Pakistan. But restores it later.
1951: Pakistan accuses India of cutting water to many of its villages.
1954: Word Bank comes up with a water-sharing formula for two countries.
1960: Indus Waters Treaty signed.
1970’s: India starts building hydropower projects in Kashmir. Pakistan raises concern.
1984: Pakistan objects over India building Tulbul barrage on Jhelum. India stops it unilaterally.
2007: Pakistan raises concern over Kishanganga hydroelectric plant.
2008: Lashkar-e-Taiba starts campaign against India. Its chief Hafiz Saeed accuses India of water terrorism.
2010: Pakistan accuses India of choking water supply consistently.
2016: India reviews working of Indus Waters Treaty linking it with cross-border terrorism (Uri attack).
Why Indus Water Treaty in news?
Indus Water Treaty is considered to be one of the most successful water-sharing endeavours in the world today. For 56 years, both India and Pakistan are peacefully sharing the water of Indus and its tributaries, thanks to The Indus Water Treaty (IWT).
Because of the confrontations between India and Pakistan over other issues, the water treaty naturally comes into picture.
After the Uri cross-border attack by Pakistan in 2016, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said “Blood and Water cannot flow simultaneously.”
There are issues between India and Pakistan, but there has been no fight over water after the Treaty was ratified. Most disagreements and disputes have been settled via legal procedures, provided for within the framework of the treaty.
Can India stop water flow to Pakistan?
No. Not as per the treaty.
What India can do is to reduce the water flow to Pakistan by utilizing the provisions of the treaty.
But any project which may affect water flow will take time for implementation, considering the cost and objections involved. Pakistan has reportedly objected to five Indian hydro power projects, and the Wullar Barrage (Tulbul Navigation Project) which must be settled before India can resume work on them.
Can India walk out of the pact unilaterally?
The treaty has no provision for either country unilaterally walking out of the pact. Article XII of the treaty says “The provisions of this Treaty, or, the provisions of this Treaty as modified under the provisions of Paragraph (3), shall continue in force until terminated by a duly ratified treaty concluded for that purpose between the two governments.” Still if India wants to go about abrogating it, the country should abide by the 1969 Vienna convention on the law of treaties.
Tulbul Project: By India
The Tulbul project is a “navigation lock-cum-control structure” at the mouth of the lake, located on the Jhelum river. It is a key intra-state channel to ferry state’s goods and people.
The idea is to ensure year-round navigation along the 20-km stretch from Anantnag to Srinagar and Baramulla, and on the 22 km-stretch between Sopore and Baramulla that becomes non-navigable in winter with water depth of only 2.5 ft (to sustain navigation through the year a minimum depth of water in the lake is necessary).
The project envisages water release from lake to maintain minimum draught of 4.5 feet in Jhelum.
India had started constructing a 439 feet long barrage at the lake’s mouth.
India unilaterally suspended the Tulbul project (Islamabad calls it Wullar Barrage) in 1987 after Pakistan objected.
The decision to review the suspension signalled the Modi government’s intent to revive it irrespective of Pakistan’s protests.
Implication: India gets to control Jhelum water, but that may impact Pakistan agriculture. The project can create problems for Pakistan’s triple-canal project that connects Jhelum-Chenab with Upper Bari Doab Canal. With a barrage, India controls release of water into Jhelum, which could trigger a flood or drought in POK and Pakistan.
Left Bank Outfall Drain (LBOD) Project: by Pakistan
Without taking consent from India, Pakistan has constructed Left Bank Outfall Drain (LBOD) project passing through the Great Rann of Kutch area (Gujarat, India) with the assistance from the World Bank. The purpose of LBOD is to bypass the saline and polluted water which is not fit for agriculture use to reach sea via Rann of Kutch area without passing through its Indus delta.
The LBOD water is planned to join the sea via Sir Creek but LBOD water is entering Indian territory due to many breaches in its left bank caused by floods. Water released by the LBOD is enhancing the flooding in India and contaminating the quality of water bodies which are source of water to salt farms spread over vast area.
Gujarat state of India being the lower most riparian part of Indus basin, Pakistan is bound to provide all the details of engineering works taken up by Pakistan to India as per the provisions of the treaty and shall not proceed with the project works till the disagreements are settled by arbitration process.