SC reserves verdict on changes to SC/ST law
02, May 2019
Prelims level : Constitutional Provisions of SC/ST
Mains level : Salient features of SC/ ST attrocties prevention act, 1989. Also write a note on recommended changes.
- The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved for judgment a batch of petitions challenging the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act of 2018 which nullified a controversial March 20 Supreme Court judgment diluting the stringent provisions of the Dalit protection law.
BACKGROUND:
The 2018 Act nullified the March 20 judgment which allowed anticipatory bail to those booked for committing atrocities against the SCs and the STs.
- The apex court verdict saw a huge backlash across the country. Several died in ensuing protests and crores worth of property was destroyed.
- The government reacted by filing a review petition and subsequently amended the 1989 Act back to its original form.
- Several petitions were filed last year challenging the amendments. The lead petitioner, advocate Prithvi Raj Chauhan, even called the amendments a “blunder” and a violation of the fundamental right to equality and personal liberty. The Supreme Court however had refused to stay the implementation of the amendments.
- The government had responded that there had been no decrease in the atrocities committed on the SCs/STs despite the laws meant to protect their civil rights.